Which statement is true about the procedure for telephonic warrants?

Which statement is true about the procedure for telephonic warrants?

• A. The LEO signs the duplicate but not the original
• B. The judge does not record the call
• C. The warrant is signed only by a private attorney
• D. After telephonic approval, the LEO signs the original warrant

Answer: (D)

Telephonic warrants rely on the judge’s authorization by phone, but the executed document must be made official by the officer on the scene. After the judge approves by telephone, the officer signs the original warrant to certify that the warrant is being executed under that authority and to create a signed, enforceable record for the scene and for filing. This signing by the officer helps establish a clear chain of authority and accountability for the search. The other details—the call being recorded or logged, the requirement that a private attorney cannot issue or sign warrants, and the need for the proper signing of the original rather than a non-official copy—support why this step is essential.

Telephonic warrants rely on the judge’s authorization by phone, but the executed document must be made official by the officer on the scene. After the judge approves by telephone, the officer signs the original warrant to certify that the warrant is being executed under that authority and to create a signed, enforceable record for the scene and for filing. This signing by the officer helps establish a clear chain of authority and accountability for the search. The other details—the call being recorded or logged, the requirement that a private attorney cannot issue or sign warrants, and the need for the proper signing of the original rather than a non-official copy—support why this step is essential.